Recommendations by the UWS Regional Studies Research Group have been adopted into the policies of local and international governments (e.g. the UK, Scotland, Spain, and Mexico), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Commission.
Research by the Regional Studies Research Group at UWS on the role and achievements of regional development agencies (RDA) across Europe led to the concept of a model RDA. The model demonstrates that future performance of RDAs needs to be underpinned by good collaborative working relationships with private sector clients and also targeted interaction with providers of business services and public knowledge institutions such as universities.
The Regional Studies Research Group at UWS has been studying the role of regional development agencies (RDAs) since the early 1990s. The team has published widely in the field with over 50 peer-reviewed journal articles, 10 books, more than 60 book chapters and many official reports to local, national and international governments and bodies.
In 1997 the group published a seminal paper which analysed a variety of structures and working methods for RDAs. This article offered the first survey of regional development bodies in eight western European countries and analysed the systematic differences between various types of regionally-based development bodies and illuminated possible origins of this pattern of dissimilarity. The researchers concluded that successful future performance of RDAs will require not only good working relationships with private sector clients but also fruitful interaction with providers of business services and public knowledge institutions. The model agency proposed by the researchers has provided the basis for many later studies (71 citations) and was explored, analysed and refined in numerous books on the subject. The team built on its initial innovative RDA research to examine the necessary characteristics that development agencies need to incorporate to be considered effective model agencies.
This work led to a focus on renewing the networks of RDAs in Europe and a number of additional publications, including a paper in Environment and Planning C which was recognised as the ‘Editors Choice’ paper.
Professor Mike Danson, who led the UWS Regional Studies Research Group until 2012, was elected as a Fellow of The Institute of Economic Development (2007) and of the Regional Studies Association (2011) in recognition of his outstanding research contribution.
Recognising the research group’s expertise and authority in regional development, the Scottish Parliament commissioned the group to carry out research and advise on economic development strategies in Scotland. Based on the studies’ findings, the team recommended the reorganisation of Scottish RDAs into bodies with formal local economic fora to deliver business development services.
Scottish Enterprise also commissioned research and benchmarking studies from the research group which revealed that economic development agencies across the world had evolved considerably since the early studies by the team. This global review and examination of current good practice in RDAs suggested that Scottish Enterprise could no longer be considered a model agency.
The first generation of RDAs was established in the 1970s and 80s, but the work of the Regional Studies Research Group was the first major study and evaluation of different working approaches. The notion of ‘model RDAs’ introduced by Halkier and Danson in 1997 stimulated workshops, conferences and presentations to Eurada (The European Association of RDAs).
Stemming from this initial work, subsequent studies have continued to support and provide evidence for policy developments from 2008 onwards. Three specific examples are summarised to illustrate the broad international impact of the research and its influence in the area of regional development.
Alongside their academic publications and the specific contributions to policy development outlined below, the researchers have disseminated their findings and recommendations to the policy-making community through a variety of channels, including:
Professor Danson was an expert member of the team responsible for the OECD Territorial Review of Chihuahua, Mexico. This independent peer review body, which published under the auspices of OECD, carried out research to benchmark the Chihuahua region against peers internationally. The output of a Territorial Review is a formal publication of significant importance internationally.
Applying expertise in clusters and city regions (cf section 3.5) Danson and his colleagues contributed to Section 2.3 of the Review which evaluated multi-level governance in the region. He described and made recommendations about models of governance, RDAs and public-private cooperation
The review process gained extensive and daily coverage on the mass media - TV, radio, papers, and led to invitations for Danson to present seminars in Paris to the OECD and independently to the DATAR and Science Po international research centres, in Tyrol and elsewhere.
The Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee of the Scottish Parliament, during its consideration of the 2010-11 budget, raised questions about the purpose of the enterprise network in Scotland and its role in economic development. As part of its inquiry the Committee took evidence from Danson at its 30th Meeting, 2010 (Session 3), on 10 November 2010 [B]. In its final report “A fundamental review of the purpose of an enterprise agency and the success of the recent reforms, 2011” the committee quotes extensively from Danson’s evidence particularly on: the shape of the agencies and their relationship to government; enterprise agencies’ governance arrangements; the external verification of Scottish Enterprise’s impact assessment; and the examples of good practice in economic development arrangements that may be taken from elsewhere. In each of these cases the concluding statement of the Committee reflects the research-informed contribution from Danson to the inquiry.
The Committee undertook an inquiry into the proposed New Local Enterprise Partnerships, examining how these new structures would work, alongside issues such as distribution of funding, value for money, accountability, timing, transitional arrangements and required legislation. Danson with colleagues, D Bailey, P Benneworth and H Halkier, co-authored written evidence submitted on behalf of the Regional Studies Association (RSA). The memorandum ‘The New Local Enterprise Partnerships’ drew on current literature and evidence from the UWS research team’s studies regarding the role of Economic Development Agencies (EDAs) and partnerships in delivering economic development at the regional and sub-regional levels. The memorandum commented on the outline proposals for revising English sub-national regional development policies, and listed recommendations about the role and constitution of Local Enterprise Partnerships, their funding and their relationships with central government. In its report, ‘The New Local Enterprise Partnerships: An Initial Assessment’, Select Committee cites the Regional Studies Association contribution to its discussion of, and recommendations for, ensuring the stability of LEPs (paragraph 153).